adamshoalts.com: Columns

A few summers ago a friend and I drove Ontario’s remote highway 599, the most northern route in the entire province. From the trans-Canada highway halfway between Thunder Bay and Manitoba, this small, winding highway stretches north deep into the wilderness of the boreal forest.

Driving along this two-lane road we saw few other traffic, but plenty of wildlife: cow and calf moose, even a black bear. Hemming the roadway in on both sides was seemingly endless coniferous forest; interrupted only occasionally by pristine blue lakes and raging white water rivers.

That is, until we suddenly came across a vast clear-cut section where every tree had been felled for as far as the eye could see. Where once had been a virgin forest stood a barren moonscape of lifeless land.

It was the sort of spectacle most people associate more commonly with the massive clear-cutting of the Amazon rainforest rather than northern Ontario. But sadly, the reality is our frontier forests are suffering the same fate as the rest of the world’s.

Despite all the hype about the environment these days, there is a major disconnect between green rhetoric and concrete action. Particularly with regard to the strain of the environmental movement that has always been near and dear to my own heart: wilderness preservation.
Although this is the oldest strand of the environment movement, and its origins can be traced far back in history, today it garners considerably less attention than the “Al Gore” variety.

In Canada, it can be dated from 1888: when the first National Park, Banff, was created. Then in the 1930s the wilderness preservation movement found its most charismatic champion in the legendary Grey Owl, a woodsman and writer.

But in point of fact, the longstanding fight to save the planet’s wild places has been a losing battle. Today, precious little remains of the world’s once vast forests, and what does remain is typically fragmented and second-growth.

While many different organizations and individuals across the globe are fighting hard to save what little is left of our planet’s wilderness forests, victories tend to be few and far between.
Indeed, in the latest issue of Canadian Geographic an up-to-date global map vividly displayed the world’s shrinking frontier forests—essentially pristine wilderness forests able to support biodiversity. The world has become astonishingly barren of virgin forests.

Europe and the continental United States possess virtually no remaining frontier forest, and the rest of the world is rapidly heading in that direction. Asia, for example, has lost 95 percent of its once vast frontier forests.

The famed jungles of Vietnam are almost no more, as human populations swell and logging and other practices clear the land. Even in the heart of underdeveloped Africa, the once vast Congo rainforest, where Joseph Conrad set Heart of Darkness, only small patches of frontier rainforest remain today.

Few Canadians, I suspect, realize that the largest intact wilderness forest on earth is right here in our own country: the boreal forest of the north. It is larger than even the Amazon jungle, which has been depleted at an alarming rate and continues to vanish. Moreover, the thickest and largest track of it is in fact confined here in Ontario.

So, since we Canadians still possess forested wilderness, which has become so exceptionally rare today, you would think we would be leaders in protecting it. Not in the slightest.

Our own wilderness is disappearing rapidly, under the pressures of logging, mining, new highways, and expanding human populations.

In 2004, I explored the Otoskwin-Attawapiskat River, deep in the heart of the remaining frontier forest, and subsequently published the first account of that remote river in history. Today, that river, a mere four years ago one of the most pristine on the planet, is now home to a massive mine.

In fact, only 10 percent of our boreal forest is protected at all.

If that figure doesn’t change soon, it will not be long before Canada’s wilderness goes the same way as the rest of the world’s. And then, when people want to see and experience the majesty and mystery of frontier forests, the only place they will find it is in books or their imagination.

Published by the Welland Tribune, June 11 2008.

16 April, 2008
For the Welland Tribune
By Adam Shoalts

Country fields stretched as far as the eye could see, punctuated here and there by thick stands of deciduous woodlots. It was a quiet, sleepy little out of the way rural town. Creeks flowed through the fields, and in spring teemed with spawning northern pike. Deer and coyotes would pass through the woods and over the rich agricultural lands.

Then, seemingly overnight, all this changed.

What was once a rural paradise and small farming community, was rapidly transformed into a massive, impersonal, monotonous, sprawling sea of suburban housing.
I am referring to Binbrook, once known locally for Lake Niapenco, and now notorious for being a prime example of the worse sort of unmanaged urban sprawl.

The town is simply no longer recognizable as Binbrook: in fact, it is virtually indistinguishable from a Toronto suburb or any other mega-city suburb.

All sense of distinctness, of the individual character of a particular place, has given way in recent times to the massive, impersonal subdivisions that are constructed as cheaply as possible and with as little variation in home design as possible.

These sprawling subdivisions radiate outwards from major cities, inexorably swallowing up more and more of the rural lands that once dominated southern Ontario.

The result is Binbrook: a place where what was once field and forest is now a sea of suburbia that engulfs a mind-staggering swath of countryside.

But readers need not drive to Binbrook in order to view this spectacle for themselves: if our politicians and municipal planners have it their way, it will be possible to view this incredible magic trick, in which countryside is turned into Toronto suburbia practically overnight, right here in Niagara.

Actually, to be fair, there are already many examples across Niagara of rampant, uncontrolled urban sprawl having engulfed whole tracks of forests and farmland.

For example, in St. Catharines just north of the Niagara Escarpment, one can find the same urban sprawl of near-identical residential development.

The future, however, seems to hold even bigger transformations that will make the village of Fenwick and the rural community of Wainfleet into the “next Binbrook.”

Local developers recently announced plans to double the population of Fenwick by means of a massive subdivision housing project in a currently rural area that contains significant wetlands, forest, and agricultural lands.

Meanwhile, in Wainfleet, the battle over the Region’s proposed municipal water and sewer pipeline continues to rage. Of course, the water and sewer pipeline is a thinly veiled attempt to open the door for future development along the Lake Erie shoreline.

(It was the same story in Binbrook, when the big pipe came down highway 56.)

A preview of what is to come has already been put in motion at the former Easter Seals camp along Lake Erie, where crowded development is underway.

None of this bodes well for the future of Welland. Instead of redeveloping the unused industrial lands of the Rose City, which could help revitalize the downtown core by infusing desperately needed consumers for the local shops and businesses, the major housing projects are being built away from Welland’s urban area.

Indeed, it remains a mystery why with so much potential to construct new homes in areas that are already urban or zoned industrial but unused, city and town planners are still directing develop outwards rather than inwards.

Both big cities and small rural communities suffer as a result.

Former Ontario premier Mike Harris, a man who by anyone’s standards was a friend to business, said in 2001 that, “…Inefficient and unplanned growth could lead to higher infrastructure costs, higher taxes, more pollution and less green space.”

Indeed it does.

The rural areas are losing not only prime farmlands; residents are almost unanimously dismayed by the transformation of their quiet rural communities into the giant subdivisions many of them moved to the countryside to escape from.

Wildlife are losing already scarce habitat and the fight against global warming is dealt a blow by making walking to work impractical and re-entrenching society’s dependence on the car.

Thanks to sprawl local taxpayers and homeowners typically see their taxes increase in order to cover the heavy cost of new municipal water and sewer pipelines.

Moreover, the destruction of wetlands often leads to flooding and water runoff problems.
Whereas wetlands once provided local flood and pollution control for free, by destroying these wetlands it inevitably necessitates expensive infrastructure projects to deal with the resulting overflow and runoff troubles. Such problems have already occurred in Fenwick around the new and still expanding Cherry Ridge subdivision.

Urban sprawl may not even benefit the new homeowners that move into the expanding suburbs. An American study conducted by Smart Growth America found strong evidence to link obesity and sprawl. The underlying factors are clear: people who live in sprawling, car-dependent subdivisions are likely to walk less, weigh more, and have high blood pressure.

In fact, it is difficult to perceive whom exactly all this rampant urban sprawl actually benefits: except, perhaps, the developers themselves.

HOME

14 February, 2008
Environmentalists not all Left-Wing
For the Welland Tribune: By Adam Shoalts

Often when I am a guest speaker in a classroom or elsewhere I find myself confronted with the question of how someone who advocates protecting the planet’s wild spaces avoids the left-wing tree-hugger label.

This stems from the widely held perception amongst the media and general public alike that environmentalists and environmentalism is hand-in-hand with leftist political thought. This is an erroneous assumption, by which I myself have long been exasperated.

While it is correct to say that federally the Liberals are currently more “green” in their platform than the Conservative party, it would be inaccurate to presume that all environmentalists are left-winged.

I am a self-described “Green Tory.” Unfortunately, it is a phrase virtually no one has heard of before, but since the time of Benjamin Disraeli in the 1830s we have had “Red Tories” so I think its high time a new term entered the political lexicon, “Green Tories.”

In many respects, perhaps most, true Toryism or conservatism more logically fits with an environmental outlook than it does with the traditional, progress-driven liberal ideology.

Respected author Charles Taylor outlined in his classic book, “Radical Tories” the deep connection between conservatism and the land that has always been a hallmark of Toryism.

As for concerns that environmentally friendly practices have detrimental economical effects, that is a demonstrable myth. Take for instance British economist Sir Nicholas Stern’s high-profile, 700-page report to the British government in 2006 on the potential economical effects of unchecked climate change.

Stern, the former chief economist of the World Bank, is certainly no leftist, yet his report concluded that global warming has the potential to trigger an economical depression on par with the Great Depression of the 1930s.

Needless to say, no business-minded conservative in his or her right mind would desire such an outcome. Moreover, this is to say nothing of the potential to make money capitalizing on consumer desire for more energy efficient products.

Green Tories in Canada may be something of endangered species today, but a glance at our past shows many Conservatives have had strong environmental credentials.
Canada’s first and greatest prime minister, Sir John A. Macdonald, was a Conservative yet created Canada’s first National Park, Banff, in order to preserve this nation’s natural beauties for posterity.

More recently, in 2006 Brian Mulroney, a Conservative, was named Canada’s “greenest” prime minister ever. Elizabeth May, the leader of the federal Green Party, at the time correctly noted that, “Mulroney had an environmental records that puts subsequent prime ministers to shame.”

It is also worth noting that May’s predecessor, Jim Harris, was a self-described “eco-capitalist” and small “c” conservative with a business-friendly agenda.

Provincially, Mike Harris’ Conservative government is best remembered for its cuts to social services. However, it was these same Conservatives that created 378 new provincial parks and protected areas, more than any previous government in Ontario’s history. They also abolished the spring bear hunt.

At any rate, the Conservatives under Mike Harris did more to protect this province’s natural wonders than either the New Democratic Party under Bob Rae or the Liberals under Dalton McGuinty have done (thus far).

Long-time organic farmer and avowed environmentalist David Orchard placed second in the 1998 leadership convention for the federal Progressive Conservative party, and third in the 2003 one.

Unfortunately, the merger between the much-larger Canadian Alliance and the Progressive Conservatives largely eliminated the green aspects of Canadian conservatism, and incidentally helped strengthen the left-green perception in this country.

However, it is my sincere hope that Canada’s Conservatives will eventually come to their senses and return to their inherited environmentalism.

Besides, if conservative parties continue to permit leftist and centralist parties to occupy the moral high ground on environmental issues, the prospect of capturing a majority government federally for Stephen Harper, and provincially for John Tory to return from the political wilderness remains doubtful.

HOME

12 December 2007
Cougar’s Resurgence a Natural Success Story
For the Welland Tribune: by Adam Shoalts

It was a deathly cold night; a fresh snowfall blanketed the ground while pale moonlight eerily illuminated the rolling fields and surrounding deciduous forests. Immediately in front of me lay a grisly sight: the mangled remains of a half-devoured deer carcass.

After nights spent wandering, I felt I was at last close to the object of my search: Pelham’s elusive cougar. This evidently was a fresh kill. The cougar, so I hoped, was still somewhere nearby. Perhaps right behind me, in the thick bushes.

But to start from the beginning.

Cougars, also variously known as panthers, mountain lions, or pumas, once inhabited virtually the whole of this continent, save for the Arctic. However, increasing human populations, expanding farmlands, and above all rampant hunting of these big cats resulted in the general belief that they had been extirpated from not only Ontario, but the whole of the northeastern portion of North America.

An adult male cougar can weigh up to 90 kilograms (200 pounds), and in western North America where cougars remain relatively widespread, cougar attacks on humans occur periodically, sometimes resulting in death.

The last known shooting of an indigenous cougar in Ontario took place in 1884. Some twenty-four years later in 1908 naturalist C.W. Nash asserted in his Manual of Vertebrates in Ontario that the cougar had been extirpated from the province.

That has remained the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources official position on cougars to date. For decades many experts even believed that the eastern cougar (a subspecies of cougar) was extinct. In recent years though, reports have emerged that cougars still exist in the wilds of Ontario.

The evidence to support this belief is quite compelling. In 1995 scat discovered in northwestern Ontario was identified by a DNA analysis as cougar scat, and earlier this year, the MNR confirmed that scat discovered in the Wainfleet bog was positively identified as cougar scat.

Recently, residents have reported cougar sightings in North Pelham, which coincides with a province-wide trend: since 2002 more than five hundred people have reported cougar sightings in Ontario.

The Niagara Peninsula, while hardly a wilderness, is surprisingly a hotspot for these sightings. The cougar’s primary prey is whitetail deer, and the explosion of the deer population in southern Ontario, including Niagara, might be responsible for the cougar’s resurgence.

Some sceptics have argued that recent cougar sightings in eastern North America are not of wild, indigenous cougars, but in fact are only escaped or released animals from private owners or zoos.

This conjecture though, seems rather dubious. Firstly, cougar sightings are scattered all across the province, and are quite numerous, which casts considerable doubt on the notion that all of these pumas are merely escaped pets.

What is far more probable is that the cougars of eastern North America were never fully extirpated, only severely endangered, and are now staging something of a comeback.

The eastern cougar is in fact listed as an endangered species in Canada, and local lore as related by old-timers holds that remnant cougar populations have always existed in the remote interior regions of New Brunswick, as well as the Appalachian Mountains.

Bruce S. Wright argued in his 1972 book, The Eastern Panther: A Question of Survival, that the elusive cat had not been entirely extirpated. Wright detailed extensive eyewitness accounts of cougars, photographed cougar tracks, and found other evidence of wild cougars, such as dens.

More recently, a story by Bob Reguly in the sportsman magazine Outdoor Canada discussed the discovery of cougars’ tracks and dens in Ontario (one such site was in Niagara), and quoted several MNR officials as saying they believe some wild cougars still exist in Ontario.

Finally, this past summer a column by myself appeared in the Welland Tribune detailing my own ongoing quest to find cougars in the Wainfleet bog.

When the recent reports of a cougar emerged here in Pelham, it created a rather hysterical reaction: the Niagara Regional Police sent a detective to investigate, the MNR set up cameras on a property where sightings occurred, and the town even hired a “professional” trapper to find the beast.

I thought I might undertake some nocturnal excursions of my own in a location I suspected was prime cougar habitat.

And sure enough, sometime past midnight, with my whole body trembling (from the cold of course) I seemingly at last crossed paths with a cougar. In the darkness, I could not see it: but evidently, I had startled it from its fresh kill.

Not one to disturb a cougar on the prowl, after a brief investigation, I decided to leave and let the cougar be.

Hopefully, all of Niagara’s residents will leave these magnificent animals unharmed and allow this wildlife success story to continue. After all, it is against the law to kill an endangered species.

HOME

October 17, 2008
For the Welland Tribune
By Adam Shoalts

I swung my ash paddle deeper into the warm, aqua coloured waters of Lake Erie and propelled my cedar-strip canoe along at a quick pace.

To my right was white, sandy shoreline and clusters of cottages amid the trees, and on my left was the vast expanse of the world’s ninth largest freshwater lake.

Canoeing along the shoreline of Lake Erie is something I find to be highly enjoyable, and when the wind is fierce and the waves large, doubly enjoyable.

However, canoeing is not everyone’s cup of tea, particularly on large bodies of water with regular storms. Many people, I suspect, would prefer to take a nice stroll along the shoreline instead.

I admit that some days even I would rather take in the beauty of Lake Erie from the shore than bother with the canoe. But there is a problem with that.

Walking the shorelines of our Great Lakes has become increasingly difficult over the last several decades, as much of it has become fenced-in private property.

This is especially true of Lake Erie, where here in Niagara local residents wanting to walk the beaches often encounter fences or demands to leave by lakefront property owners.

It was not always this way.

For generations, by longstanding convention, anyone wishing to walk along the Great Lakes enjoyed right of passage. That meant anyone was free to pass through privately owned shoreline, they just couldn’t stop to picnic or camp.

In the 1990s though this began to change. Some private citizens, who claimed to own property right down to the water’s edge, commenced the gradual fencing and in some cases barricading of the beaches in order to keep the public out.

For some time now a campaign to restore the right of passage has been gaining momentum. A few years ago some Fort Erie residents formed Shorewalk, an association devoted to the cause of regaining the right of passage along the Great Lakes.

Shorewalk succeeded in enlisting the aid of local Liberal MPP Kim Craitor, who earlier this year introduced a private member’s bill in Ontario’s legislative assembly calling for public right of passage access to Great Lakes shorelines.

However, the bill (Bill 43) did not make it past first reading, and now that we have had an election, any bill on this matter will have to be reintroduced.

Fortunately for Shorewalk, Craitor was re-elected and is said to be very committed to this issue.

The principle behind the bill does have some support at the municipal level. Two Great Lakes municipalities, Fort Erie and Cobourg, passed motions endorsing the principle behind Bill 43.

This now defunct right of passage bill could hardly be labelled radical. It simply sought to restore an age-old custom of uninhibited walking rights along the Great Lakes shorelines for everyone.

As a matter of fact, across the border in the United States (where property rights are generally thought to be more entrenched than here in Canada) right of passage legislation has recently been enacted in the state of Michigan in the wake of judicial rulings on the matter.

If Bill 43 had passed, Canadians would merely have enjoyed the same shoreline access that Americans already possess in Michigan.

The proposed Bill 43 did not grant the public the right to picnic or camp on private beaches, only the right of passage. Nor did it permit for motorized vehicles to travel across private property.

It did not even go so far as to permit sunbathing on the beaches in question – strictly right of passage on foot.

I therefore do not think this is too much to ask for: right of passage along the Great Lakes is something that should be restored to everyone.

These immense “freshwater seas” are a natural wonder without parallel anywhere else in the world, and as such should be open to all.

HOME

August 30, 2007
For the Welland Tribune
Adam Shoalts

Deep in the Canadian wilderness, some 400 kilometres north of Lake Superior, I paddled along a wild, majestic river with my friend Wesley Crowe in the summer of 2004.

We were awed by the river’s remoteness, its ancient forests, the abundance of wildlife, and the intensity of the white water rapids. As a lover of wilderness travel, I knew I had found a gem in terms of pristine, unspoiled wilderness – something that is increasingly difficult to find these days.

Unfortunately, in the 21st century the world’s once vast reaches of unsettled wilderness are by and large a thing of the past. The population explosion of the 20th century combined with industrialization left the previously green spaces of the Earth ravaged, depleted and, in many cases, altogether vanished.

Humans have trampled over every last corner of the Earth’s land surface, and roads, human habitation, and pollution of one sort or another can be found even in the deepest pockets of remaining wilderness.

Yet this river we were travelling, the Otoskwin-Attawapiskat, seemed to be a miraculous exception to all this.

Here in Canada, successive provincial and federal governments have been guilty of taking the country’s wilderness for granted, erroneously believing it was sufficiently vast to endure forever.

As a result of this major misconception, comparatively little of Canada’s great stretches of wild were protected, and hence the reason it is hard to find much pure wilderness remaining today.

It therefore came as welcome news when the federal government recently announced that the famed Nahanni River in the Northwest Territories would be further protected by the expansion of the existing Nahanni National Park Reserve.

The Nahanni River is a majestic place of towering limestone canyons, raging white water rapids and spectacular waterfalls.

While I personally have not as of yet canoed the Nahanni River, I have canoed a river that surpasses the Nahanni in remoteness and nearly equals it in majesty, but has nothing of the Nahanni’s renown.

After graduating from high school, my friend and I wanted to attempt to canoe the remotest, most untouched river we could find. Naturally then, we focused our attention on one of the largest intact areas of wilderness left on Earth, the vast stretch of boreal forest and muskeg that covers the far northern part of Ontario.

We selected for my trip the almost unheard of Otoskwin-Attawapiskat River system, a 750-kilometre waterway that slices through the heart of this last great wilderness before emptying into James Bay.

I was awe-struck by the beauty of this wild river, and afterwards recounted the tale of our journey in my book, Sense of Adventure, published last year by Cedar Tree Press.

While the upper section of the Otoskwin-Attawapiskat is partially protected by a provincial park, the lower section is Crown land and thus remains unprotected from industrial projects.

As a result of poor, short-term policies, or rather a lack of policies by the provincial and federal governments, Ontario’s far north is now under ever-increasing threat from industrial development projects, especially mining and logging.

This includes the Otoskwin-Attawapiskat River.

A South African diamond conglomerate has plans to establish what would be Ontario’s first diamond mine, on the Otoskwin-Attawapiskat River, approximately 90 kilometres inland from the James Bay coast. Despite calls from numerous conservation and environmental groups to halt this ecologically destructive project, the firm has been granted the go-ahead and construction is expected to commence in 2008.

If built, the mine will necessitate the construction of roads and hydro corridors penetrating into the depths of this wilderness, a giant open-pit mine over two kilometres in width, as well as an industrial complex.

The muskeg surrounding the proposed site of the mine must be drained, which will irrevocably destroy the area’s natural environment. A massive amount of water, 100,000 cubic metres or roughly 40 Olympic-sized swimming pools, is expected to be daily pumped out of the diamond pit and into the nearby river.

It is believed that at least 5,000 square hectares will be affected by the mine, thus forever ruining this magnificent wilderness. The river itself is almost certain to become contaminated, and numerous animal species, including the threatened woodland caribou, will lose a huge portion of their habitat.

With the Ontario provincial election looming, now may be the last chance for concerned citizens to make their voices heard on this urgent issue.

I for one think it is high time to make our politicians realize that wantonly destroying the last great wilderness of the world in order to satisfy the greed of foreign mineral companies is madness.

Pristine, unspoiled wilderness is rarer than diamonds these days, hence the reason I believe we should save this river – the real gem – from suffering the same fate of all too many other wild places.

HOME

11 July 2007
Return of the Eastern Cougar?
For the Welland Tribune: by Adam Shoalts

With my sturdy walking stick in hand, I wandered alone through a labyrinth of lush foliage, inhabited by venomous snakes, prowling panthers, and blood-sucking insects. The heat and humidity felt suffocating.

Was I in the South American jungle? No, that trip of mine, alas, lies further down the road.
I was, in fact, still right here in the Niagara Peninsula, somewhere deep in the Wainfleet Bog: the largest protected area in the peninsula. It consists of 801 hectares of land owned by the Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority, as well as a smaller tract belonging to the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR).

I am familiar with the Wainfleet Bog, having worked one summer for the MNR in which I spent several weeks conducting soil sampling in the bog.

The Wainfleet Bog is the largest remaining bog in all of Southern Ontario, and constitutes the greatest stretch of unbroken greenery within the confines of Niagara. It contains an astonishing diversity of flora, including 350 different species of bog plants.

The bog is home to the Eastern Massassauga Rattlesnake, an endangered species and the only venomous snake native to Ontario. However, rattlesnakes, while fascinating in their own right, were not the object of my visit to the bog on this occasion.

I ventured into the deciduous forests of the bog to seek out evidence of the elusive Eastern Cougar, which officially has been extirpated from this province for nearly a century. Cougars, also variously known as panthers, mountain lions, or pumas, once inhabited virtually the whole of this continent, save for the far North.

An adult male cougar can weigh up to 90 kilograms (200 pounds), and in Western North America where cougars remain relatively widespread, cougar attacks on humans occur periodically, sometimes resulting in death.

Increasing human populations, expanding farmlands, and above all rampant hunting of these big cats resulted in the general belief that they had been extirpated from not only Ontario, but the whole of the northeastern portion of North America.

The last known shooting of an indigenous cougar in Ontario took place in 1884, in Creemore. In 1908, naturalist C.W. Nash’s book, Manual of Vertebrates in Ontario, was published, in which he asserted that the cougar had been extirpated from Ontario.

That has remained the MNR’s official position on cougars. For decades many experts even believed that the Eastern Cougar was extinct. However, today some MNR biologists and many others firmly believe that cougars still exist in the wilds of Ontario.

The evidence to support this belief is quite convincing and manifold. In 1995 scat discovered in northwestern Ontario was identified by a DNA analysis as cougar scat, and earlier this year, the MNR confirmed that scat discovered in the Wainfleet bog was positively identified as cougar scat.

Hence the reason I set out alone into the bog, hoping to uncover further evidence of these magnificent predators, or perhaps even catch a glimpse of one. While I was unsuccessful in my quest on this particular day, in Ontario more than five hundred people have reported cougar sightings since 2002.

The Niagara Peninsula, while hardly a wilderness, is surprisingly a hotspot for these sightings. The cougar’s primary prey is whitetail deer, and the explosion of the deer population of Southern Ontario, including Niagara, might be responsible for the resurgence of the cougar.

Some sceptics have argued that recent cougar sightings in eastern North America are not of wild, indigenous cougars, but in fact are only escaped or released animals from private owners or zoos.

This conjecture though, seems rather dubious. Firstly, cougar sightings are scattered all across the province, and are quite numerous, which casts considerable doubt on the notion that all of these pumas are merely escaped pets.

What is far more probable is that the cougars of eastern North America were never fully extirpated, only severely endangered, and are now staging something of a comeback.
The Eastern Cougar is in fact listed as an endangered species in Canada, and local lore as related by old-timers holds that remnant cougar populations have long existed in the remote interior regions of New Brunswick, as well as the Appalachian Mountains.

Bruce S. Wright, a naturalist and conservationist, argued in his 1972 book, The Eastern Panther: A Question of Survival, that the elusive cat had not been entirely extirpated. Wright detailed extensive eyewitness accounts of cougars, photographed cougar tracks, and found other evidence of wild cougars, such as dens.

More recently, a story by Bob Reguly in the sportsman magazine Outdoor Canada discussed the discovery of cougars’ tracks and dens in Southern Ontario (one such site was in Niagara), and quoted several MNR officials as saying they believe some wild cougars still exist in Ontario.
As for myself, I want to believe in this wildlife success story, and intend to continue my solitary wanderings through the woods until I see one of these magnificent animals with my own eyes.

HOME

23 May 2007
Not Another Highway
For the Welland Tribune: by Adam Shoalts

For the past six years there has been talk of inflicting another scar upon Niagara’s landscape in the form of a major new highway. This proposed highway, known variously as the mid-peninsula corridor or the Niagara to GTA transportation corridor, has from the start faced stiff opposition from environmentalists.

Indisputably, a four-lane highway along the lines of the current Queen Elizabeth Way would be detrimental to Niagara’s natural environment.

Wildlife movements would be severely restricted, woodlots would be sliced in two, and of course air quality would deteriorate as a result of the increase in the burning of fossil fuels via vehicles.
More specifically, environmentalists have raised concerns that a new highway would further endanger the already beleaguered Niagara Escarpment. The fact that in 1990 UNESCO designated the escarpment a World Biosphere Reserve in recognition of its ecological uniqueness is no guarantee that a four-lane highway will not cross it.

To permit a major highway to cut across this ridge of greenery would be a terrible shame. The escarpment’s current role as a wildlife corridor would be put in serious jeopardy, not to mention the ruinous effects on the natural beauty of the area.

Additionally, any creation of a mega-highway through Niagara’s countryside would shatter rural peace and quiet, and radically transform the surrounding area.

As of yet, no definite route for a highway has been determined, however, it is believed any route would traverse southern Niagara, including Wainfleet and Lincoln.

It is hard to conceive that anyone currently living in these rural areas could desire a noisy mega-highway running through their backyards. And of course, a major highway would cause neighbouring residential property values to plunge.

Nor is it at all logical, in light of a little problem called Global Warming, to be contemplating the construction of another highway. After all, shouldn’t the provincial government (and all other levels of government for that matter) be doing everything possible to encourage people to drive less, and instead rely more on public transport?

Certainly, constructing four-lane highways would seem like a major step backwards in the fight against climate change.

Even if one were to cast aside all environmental, aesthetic, and human concerns, there are still strong economic grounds to oppose the idea of constructing a highway.

The whole basis for establishing another highway linking the Greater Toronto Area to Niagara and Buffalo revolves around the rather dubious assumption that highway traffic is going to increase or at least remain at current levels.

However, for this to happen a steady supply of affordable oil is required, and with inexorably rising gas prices it appears the era of cheap oil is over.

High gas prices are a result of increasing demand in developing nations, particularly China and India. As such, it is not something that is likely to change.

Even more importantly, world oil production is inevitably going to peak, which will probably occur within the next couple decades at the latest. (See Robert L. Hirsch et al., “Peaking Oil Production: Sooner Rather Than Later?” Issues in Science and Technology 21(3) [1999]).
Accordingly, as the world’s oil reserves are depleted, gas prices will skyrocket to a point where the average Canadian can no longer afford to fuel up regularly.

It is therefore apparent that people will be driving vehicles less, not more, in the not-too-distant future.

Claims that biofuels can supply the solution to the world’s oil supply crisis are pure fantasy. Repeated studies have proven that the production of biofuels actually necessitates the expenditure of more energy than is worth the effort. (See Marcelo E. Dias de Oliveira et al., “Ethanol as Fuel: Energy, Carbon Dioxide Balances, and Ecological Footprint.” BioScience 55, July 2005).

Furthermore, with oil prices rising transport-trucking will rapidly become uneconomical, resulting in a greater reliance upon shipping by rail and canal. Without transport trucks on the roads, and with fewer vehicles in general, the construction of new mega-highways becomes utterly unnecessary.

So why should we invest millions in the construction of a major new highway, and burden future generations with something that in all probability won’t be needed?

Fortunately, the provincial government has proceeded at a snail’s pace on this issue, and has thankfully not yet ruled out constructing rail services as an alternative to a highway.

If the reader, like me, does not want to see this highway built, I urge you to visit www.niagara-gta.com and submit your concerns to the Niagara-GTA Corridor Environmental Assessment committee, or write to your Member of Provincial Parliament.

HOME